Provincial Government to Can the Use of 13 Litre Toilets – Green News – by Richard Komorowski – Cornwall Ontario – April 28, 2010

Provincial Government to Can the Use of 13 Litre Toilets – Green News – by Richard Komorowski – Cornwall Ontario – April 28, 2010

Provincial Government to Can the Use of 13 Litre Toilets

Cornwall ON – Ontarians currently use about 260 litres of water per day – nearly twice as much as the UK and Germany, countries with similar standards of living. The Ontario Government is planning to introduce legislation under the Green Energy Act to reduce this amount.

The provincial government is about to ban the sale of the older style, wasteful, 13 litre flush toilets – in the future, only the 6 litre models will be available.

Toilet flushing accounts for 30% of in-home water use. Replacing a 13 litre toilet with a 6 litre one could save an average household around 35,000 litres per year. According to Ontario Energy and Infrastructure Minister Brad Duguid, “reducing the water we use in our daily lives achieves the dual benefit of conserving water and energy.”

Pumping and distributing water to homes and businesses and treating water and wastewater takes between a third and a half of a municipality’s electric consumption, roughly double that of street lighting.

please visit our sponsors:


Please follow and like us:
error

7
Leave a Reply

avatar
400
6 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
AntipastaRichard KomorowskiEricadminJerry Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
grimalot
Guest
grimalot

If its yellow, leave it mellow, if its brown, flush it down! Great motto to live by if you own a 13 litre toilet! 😀

Jerry
Member
Jerry

It is time to have water meters for everyone. That way you would be flushing your own money down the drain and not your neighbours.

admin
Admin

Jerry you’d be doing that anyway and what’s the point of a water meter when more water leaks out of the pipes before it gets to your house than you waste? With improvements like this, legitimate education of the public; most of whom support water conservation and a few simple surtaxes, like on swimming pools do we really need such a negative item for Cornwall as Water Meters which have a clear history of not saving the taxpayer any money?

I think not.

Eric
Guest
Eric

Pumping, distrubuting and treating water and wastewater should cost more than lighting. We need safe water. You need storage and 2 sets of pipes first of all. But when you flush 13 litres, does that not go back through sewage pipes to storage for cleaning? Then does most of it not go back to the river from where it came?

People on well and septic are not wasting water either, most goes back into the water table.

Water meters are used to make more money so the government does not need to actually provide cost effective service, from my view.

The Watcher
Member
The Watcher

Just to clarify a few points here: First, if we use less water, it costs less to purify and pump the clean water into the water mains for distribution to houses. There is a cost saving here. The second point is that when we flush our toilets with a few lumps of poo, this all eventually finds its way to the sewage treatment plant, where these few lumps of poo need to be separated from the otherwise clean water. This also takes energy (i.e. electricity), for which the tax-payer must foot the bill. It costs less to separate 6 litres… Read more »

Eric
Guest
Eric

The amount of money coming in will not be the same if water use is lessened because sewage rates are 113% of water paid for. Will that be enough from savings of filtration? Less money coming in will mean a tax hike, because governments seem to be in the job creation business. The comment about water meters saving water, to me that means the poor will use less because they have no more money to give. Which leads to another issue, governments and union workers seem to get raises each year by charging taxpayers more. This taxpayer has no more… Read more »

Stan
Member
Stan

Eric, it’s not just governments that feed at the trough, unions do too! If you have no more to give then I’m sure they’ll cut doing something to make up for the shortfall.