The Honourable Deb Matthews,
Ontario Minister of Health & Long Term Care,
Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario.
17 May, 2010
Ref: The Pharmaceutical Professional Allowance Furore
This is an open letter to you and all others who may have become embroiled in this issue. To commence I do believe YOU took the correct course of action, in the public need, and I would request, in the interests of all those who require pharmaceutical services, that you ignore the overtures of the South Stormont Council in Eastern Ontario.
I am a resident of South Stormont and I understand the municipality has sent you a communication in this regard. Since I will be including the South Stormont Council in my mailing of this letter I will be emphasising elements of the process of which you will be familiar. For this I apologize.
The case developed by the South Stormont Council is predicated upon sheer nonsense. Councillor Hart, the person who brought this matter before council, did so on flawed information. I find it difficult to comprehend that an elected member of the council might be so naive. You must understand she gained her knowledge from visiting twelve  local pharmacies to obtain their opinions. These pharmacists argued they needed the professional allowances to cover the costs of staff and electricity.
Naturally, the pharmacists agreed with the councillor they should continue to receive the professional allowances that amount to a subsidy supporting the profession. Of course, the pharmacists made the case they were being treated unfairly and this step taken by the councillor demonstrates how immature she is. The same councillor could have asked twelve council employees if they should be given a pay increase and it would have been a resounding ‘yes’.
Let us look at a few facts related to the pharmaceutical profession where the pharmacist is the owner/operator. Watching a pharmacist at work we will see this professional fill, as a minimum, ten to twelve prescriptions every hour. A little elementary school arithmetic will show us the pharmacist is earning more than sixty dollars an hour just for counting pills into a plastic container and affixing a computer generated label or simply putting a label on a pre-packaged tube of ointment.
Not too shabby a return when one considers the pharmacist is dealing with a clientele that has no choice, here in Canada, but to go to a pharmacy for its needs.
Next we have the undeclared profits from all the non-prescription sales. The clients fill the need for these, in the pharmacy, since the clients are already in the establishment – items such as Tylenol, Aspirin, Nivea and a whole plethora of other products ranging from shampoo to Vaseline. To put the sale of these items into perspective perhaps we should look at how inexpensive these items are if purchased at one of the many Mexican pharmaceutical outlets scattered along the USA/Mexican border.
At the above mentioned outlets, a package of Halls throat tablets costing more than a dollar an Ontario pharmacy, can be purchased for a mere fraction of the cost. I personally purchased a box containing twenty packages of these Halls for three dollars and I could have bargained for them had I chosen to. Even prescription drugs are available at far less cost than our pharmacists charge. I know because I purchased a product, Gabapentin, not covered by my plan. These drugs were in exactly the same sealed container as produced by the drug company – they were so inexpensive only cents each and in an Ontario pharmacy they were several dollars a piece for exactly the same product.
The public has been ripped off for too long and it has taken you, a courageous Provincial Minister of Health and Long Term Care, to try and bring costs into line with reality. All the store neighbours alongside any pharmacy would tell the South Stormont councillors they, too, would like an annual subsidy to cover their electricity and staffing costs because they do NOT have a ready made clientele.
In many surveys, carried out by the media, the pharmacists interviewed spelled out their sad story but none would divulge their take home pay. They simply said this was private information but the same does not apply to the pay scales of teachers, policemen, firemen and all the public servants – are these not private, too? Yet these pay scales get published in the news media, not that there is anything wrong with this because it is a matter of public information.
I wonder if the councillor, who has decided she dislikes the provincial government we have, has watched the pharmacists she interviewed drive home to splendid residences in their top of the line luxury cars. The pharmacists are truly not hurting.
There is much talk about how the pharmacist supplements the medical profession. An unadulterated false claim because the pharmacists are only doing what the other small business people are doing, providing their customers with a good service. These actions of caring for the clientele are the same as those carried out by every small business if they want to keep their clients. It matters not if it is a restauranteur, a hardware store owner, a hairdresser or a stationary store owner, if they want to keep their customers they MUST look after them and they have no $200,000 a year professional allowance/subsidy.
I am dismayed that members of the South Stormont Council should be spending their time debating subjects not related to our municipal scene and of which they have only minimal knowledge. These elected people should be working at municipal needs and NOT wasting time interfering in matters pertaining to the provincial government.
John E. Milnes, South Stormont.
(Comments and opinions of Editorials, Letters to the Editor, and comments from readers are purely their own and don’t necessarily reflect those of the owners of the Cornwall Free News, their staff, or sponsors.)
It’s funny. When Medical Arts pharmacy lost the Glen Stor Lodge contract here what stuck out to me was the complaints from residents that the drugs not covered by their drug plans were costing them more money.
That after a city councilor, who I shant name, disclosed that there was no extra cost to Cornwall with the new contract at that time.
What do you think Ontario? Do you support the million dollar Pharmacy Campaign? Do you support Minister Matthews cuts? You can post your comments below.
please visit our sponsors: