Letter to the Editor – Janet Annesley VP Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers not Happy with Article by Richard Komorowski – November 20, 2010 – Cornwall Ontario

Letter to the Editor – Janet Annesley VP Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers not Happy with Article by Richard Komorowski – November 20, 2010 – Cornwall Ontario

Re:       Canadian Taxpayer Subsidised Tea Party Successes

Canadian Taxpayer Subsidised Tea Party Successes

By Richard Komorowski

Cornwall Free News

November 16, 2010

Editor:

Reading Mr. Komorowski’s article reminded me of another anti-corporate conspiracy rant,the Unabomber Manifesto by Ted Kaczynski.

Not only is he ill-informed on oil sands production methods, he’s clearly guessing about Canadian royalty and taxation programs. Further he’s conjuring a tenuous connection among U.S.-based Koch, its clearly disclosed political positions and the desire of Canada’s oil industry not to be taxed punitively and capriciously under California’s discriminatory low carbon fuel standard – a policy that asks Canadians to look the other way while higher-carbon Californian oil gets a free pass.
Finally, he suggests Canada should emulate China’s “green energy.” China is rolling wind turbines and solar cells off the assembly lines (should ask where those metals come from by the way) but it’s also building coal-fired power plants to increase capacity by 150 per cent over 25 years – an astounding rate. The GHG footprint of that kind of growth vastly exceeds oil sands, each and every year. Not the kind of record to which Canadians aspire.

Canada’s oil and gas industry employs more than 500,000 Canadians. We paid more than $18 billion in royalties and taxes to provincial and federal governments in 2009. The industry is one of the country’s largest sources of revenue and Canada’s single-largest private investor. Environmentally we are not perfect but we are always getting better.

And our industry has a firm grasp of global energy scenarios. Energy demand is forecast to double by 2050. Double. Given that reality, standing in the way of responsibly developed competitive renewable energy would be just as foolish as standing in the way of responsibly developed competitive Canadian oil and gas.

Janet Annesley

Vice President

Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers

(Comments and opinions of Editorials, Letters to the Editor, and comments from readers are purely their own and don’t necessarily reflect those of the owners of the Cornwall Free News, their staff, or sponsors.)

Homestead OrganicsAdvertise with Cornwall Free News

Please follow and like us:
error

39
Leave a Reply

avatar
400
33 Comment threads
6 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
13 Comment authors
flipperPGKtnpreacher555JacquelineFurtz Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
flipper
Guest
flipper

Janet Annesley’s backers may think her mastery of propaganda techniques is a strong point. I would hope that readers of the Cornwall Free News recognize it as a weak point, and only too telling of her industry and ilk. In the first sentence; “Conspiracy”, “Unabomber” and “Kaczynski” juxtaposed with “Komorowski”?!! My, my, my, my, my …Janet. The rest of her alternately manipulative and sympathy seeking blather if not confounding in it’s logic; Standing in the way of the petroleum industry is foolish because, “Energy demand is forecast to double by 2050.” — Is Janet Annesley saying we’re going to hell… Read more »

Cornwall Harry
Member
Cornwall Harry

It means they have all the eggs in their basket! Like it or not!

Eric
Guest
Eric

I would have prefered an article that teaches the points offered, instead it comes off as a rant. With that said, I would also prefer to buy local, North American fuel, and look forward to reading Ezra Lavant’s book on the industry.

flipper
Guest
flipper

Oh, …like an “egg management fee”.

Grimalot
Guest

Me thinks that Mr. Komorowski hit a soft spot with the big oil execs.. Interesting she starts off with associating Mr. Komorowski with a terrorist. Rather, if this is not happening the way Mr. Komorowski has described it as, then why didn’t she educate how things are going on otherwise, other than to flat out attack Mr. Komorowski as such? When one comes out hitting like this, it usually means they really do have something to hide, and Mr. Komorowski, please do not let them scare you, this only means you tripped on something that should be exposed, and please… Read more »

smee
Guest
smee

Come on people take a step out of line at Tim Horton’s long enough to listen. Rick means well but is often, as Janet says, ill-informed

Grimalot
Guest

Ok smee, so educate us on the correct information then… like Janet should be doing, instead of attempting to discredit Richard…

smee
Guest
smee

Grimalot In my expereince and based on the content of your post, i would rather not as is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people’s minds. I work in petro chemical and Rick has some valid points but is speaking with only about 5% actual experience and most of which seem to come from other web pages on the internet. I questioned Rick once before on Peak oil where his information was very similiar to a website of the same name. He often seems to miss the deeper issues… Read more »

smee
Guest
smee

and i think David Maclean added some information on Rick article “Canadian Taxpayer Subsidised Tea Party Successes by Richard Komorowski – Cornwall Ontario – November 16, 2010”

smee
Guest
smee

Would luv to Grimalot but jamie won’t allow the post

smee
Guest
smee

sorry my mistake seems it is just not moderated yet

Grimalot
Guest

Smee, if there is information against what Rick is saying, then all I am saying is to properly educate the masses on what is really going on. In this case, Rick wrote a story, and instead of educating people on what is really “or apparently” going on, Janet came out gun’s a blazin automatically trying to discredit Rick on what was written. As I said, it seems Rick hit a really soft spot in how he tied a few elements together and was immediately referred to as a terrorist (unabomber).. Why not instead of attacking him, did Janet not come… Read more »

smee
Guest
smee

Grimalot A tenet if you will, people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people’s minds. Ms Annesley has commented on the green energy of which Rick so often promotes and if you read closely her opinion is not that different then what I have stated. To emulate the Asian green intitatve is promotinh GHG with minimal limits. Their manufacturing mentalit is in part whay Mr Kliene told them to keep out of the oil sands. David Maclean has commented on Ricks letter to the editor regarding ” Canadian Taxpayer Subsidised Tea… Read more »

smee
Guest
smee

is it my pc?

Grimalot
Guest

See smee, I can understand that logic, and I thank you for the little tidbit of information. I happen to know Rick has his information though, and as farfetched as it may seem at times, somethings are just seen that aren’t meant for us to be seen, and Rick posted a soundly researched item, though it may not be 100% accurate in ways if what you say is true, and the response immediately was him being related to a terrorist. I still say, that though some of the information he portrays may not be 100% accurate, you (as in Janet)… Read more »

Stan
Member
Stan

Richard can’t be the Unabomber, he doesn’t even look like the Unabomber!

smee
Guest
smee

Rick is no different than Janet. He uses what information he has; extrapolates what appears to be correct forms a hypothesis not always based on reliable information. It is not at all like being there. Regarding the natural gas costs used in bitumen he is way off topic. I can tell you from experience there is a refinery in Ontario that built a gas fired co-gen facility to offset high energy prices. That was about 6/8 years ago, due to the prices of natural gas and the politics the facility was never commissioned. The company still buys power from the… Read more »

Grimalot
Guest

Rick, though he touched base on some touchy subjects, especially the Koch connection, did not come out calling the Oil Industry akin to any terrorist.. She could have contacted him, she could have come on and explained their position clearly.. but no, instead she came out guns a blazin as previously mentioned and that in my mind, shows that she has something to hide, regardless of whatever reason included in the story that Rick posted.. And again, rather than educate, she went on attack instead.. would she attack me if I said BS to their no collusion at the pump… Read more »

Stan
Member
Stan

Grimmy, don’t hold your breath

smee
Guest
smee

Grimalot,
This is getting no where, Did Rick not accuse them with out provocation? I have already shown desprepencies in his article and yet you still want more.
The pine bend refinery was purchased in the 60’s from Great Northern. and so what is it was prurchsed to refine our oil. It is owned by a subsiduary of KOCH and by purchasing our oil for refining we employ people.

If by chance they did receive favours so be it, if they don’t make money they do not spend money and we are all out of work

smee
Guest
smee

Grimalot This is just going in circles. You see a conspiracy happening here. I am not justifying Koch after seeing what occurred with Invista. Koch or its subsidiary company, Flint Hills, did contribute to California’s Proposition 23. What he did not mention is that act was futile as the bill was defeated, nor were they alone in this attempt. Not unlike many companies they are attempting to keep profitable. If these companies do receive any for royalty and taxation programs so be it. It is an unfortunate evil where in if they do not make a profit we do not… Read more »

Tar Patch Betsy
Guest
Tar Patch Betsy

Well…now we know The Seven Sisters read & fear CFN. Janet trembles.

smee
Guest
smee

here is another perspective not often shown in the media.
I posted it lastnite but for some reason it is not shown today, must be my pc again
http://xxxx

smee
Guest
smee

Jamie You are leading the media, clearly not allowing posts that provide an alternative to what best serves your own interest. Using my anonymity as an excuse to hide my posts solidifies the reason I post using a pseudonym, and many others should do the same. You cannot be trusted. Maybe a screen shot of this discussion should be placed on the net. Also a copy sent to Alexa and see how they feel about your censorship and feeble reasoning you use to support it. Would they still have you at number 2,? What would your sponsors think when they… Read more »

smee
Guest
smee

So you are saying that I cannot provide information from the CAPP site. How can Rrichard or anyone else do the same from any other site. Only because you know who they are? What a stellar basis for posting information. Seems a tad hyprocritical, especially from a person claiming they support freedom of speech.. There is aboslutely noting wrong with the information I have provided, the problem is your own lack of experience and ignorence abroad. As I have said before, Discovery Channel and David Suzuki do not provide all the answers, there are two sides and often the only… Read more »

Cornwall Harry
Member
Cornwall Harry

smee, where do you get off calling Jamie someone who cannot be trusted? I’d rather trust Jamie over a wingnut like yourself!

Furtz
Member
Furtz

I must admit that I really slowed down my commenting here a while ago because of smee’s insulting responses. Being called ignorant whenever there is a difference of opinion gets a little tiring.

Jacqueline
Guest
Jacqueline

This clip which arrived in my inbox this morning will no doubt enlighten and perhaps even spur you into some action. As Maude Barlow points out, ” With Only Market-Based Solutions on the Table “The Continued Destruction of the Earth…Can Go on Quite Happily”. Please view the following: http://www.commondreams.org/video/2010/12/06
I am dissappointed with the inaction of our Prime Minister in this matter. Shame on you Mr. Harper. Think of your children; all of our children and the world that will be left to them.

tnpreacher555
Member

“Think of your children; all of our children and the world that will be left to them”. Run for your lives – the Big Green Monster of Globe Warming is going to devour all our children! Victims in the making. Oh, Help us Kermit, save us before it is to late…………………. ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, etc. It got me!

Furtz
Member
Furtz

Oh Oh. Looks like the insanity at the Freeholder had died down, so the preacher needs the alternate outlet.
So Tom, what’s your favourite Cornwall restaurant?

PGK
Guest
PGK

Richard couldn’t possibly be the Unabomber; I know for a fact that Richard is an air-head in mathematics.

PGK
Guest
PGK

BAZINGA!

flipper
Guest
flipper

Remember this CAPP mouthpiece’s article linking Richard Komorowski’s article to the “anti-corporate conspiracy rant” of Unabomber Manifesto, Ted Kaczynski?

It seems Janet Annesley was a mothpiece for some pretty fat and conflicted politicians, and Harper toadies — if not on behalf of a behind the scenes PM himself.

http://www.vancouversun.com/business/EXCLUSIVE+Federal+government+says+industry+organized+strategy+oilsands/5229873/story.html