“Arrogant? Not yet.” Some thoughts on Harper’s Calgary speech. View From the Hill by Keith Beardsley – July 11, 2011

Ottawa ON – It must have been a dull media day for there to be so much coverage of Stephen Harper’s short talk in Calgary to some of his supporters.

To the shock and horror of some of the assembled media, Harper went so far as to predict the NDP honeymoon in Quebec wouldn’t last and he even pointed to the eventual demise of the Liberal Party. If one stops and thinks about it, it would have been more newsworthy if he didn’t make such comments. I can’t think of too many generals who would give a pep talk to their troops and at the same time make a point of telling them that they were going to be defeated in four years time.

What was really a pretty normal political speech resulted in a number of headlines that blared out news about Harper’s arrogance, all because he had the nerve to say:

“I believe the long Liberal era is genuinely, truly ending.”

Or

“Quebec’s honeymoon with the NDP will pass.”

Those were pretty tough words, even arrogant ones if you read the media coverage. And just what would they have preferred Harper say- that the Liberals will rise again or that the NDP has a lock on Quebec voters for decades to come? In the end this was nothing more than a political speech with a bit of humour thrown into the mix and nothing out of the ordinary.

However the NDP were quick off the mark to attack Harper’s criticism of their party with Joe Comartin firing away at the Prime Minister with “Here we’ve got a guy who’s saying our honeymoon is going to be over quickly with the people of Quebec after he didn’t have anything more than a one-night stand.” That was an amusing comment, but is anyone shocked that the NDP made it?

Even Bob Rae got into the act offering his few comments as he referred to Harper’s “triumphal arrogance.”

I wonder if the same folks attacking Harpers comments would consider theses other comments as arrogant?

“Starting Tuesday morning, as your prime minister …” Jack Layton, NDP leader

“I think we demonstrated that it is the NDP that is the true alternative now.” Jack Layton, NDP Leader

It’s a fact of political life that leaders give speeches to the party faithful that mention their own party in glowing terms and that are less than complimentary to their political opponents. I expect most Canadians would have a hard time remembering when our politicians last gave a nice speech about one of their opponents- the exception of course being when one of them retires and occasionally when a member of another party is defeated.

As we move further into the Conservative four year mandate there will be plenty of opportunity to observe this Prime Minister’s actions and dissect his speeches to see if the Conservatives are becoming arrogant. That applies equally to Conservative ministers, MPs and staff.

They would do so at their own peril as Canadians have never been very accepting or forgiving of arrogant politicians.  However, the reaction to the Harper speech does emphasize the need for both his speech writers and the Prime Minister himself to choose their words with care. Perception is often reality in politics and there is always a need to choose your words wisely. It’s not arrogance, not yet at least, unless it becomes a pattern and at this point in time there is no indication of that.

Keith Beardsley is a senior strategist for True North Public Affairs in Ottawa, as well as a blogger and political analyst. He can often be found running or cycling on his favorite bike trails.

 

Cornwall & Seaway Valley Tourism

5 Responses to "“Arrogant? Not yet.” Some thoughts on Harper’s Calgary speech. View From the Hill by Keith Beardsley – July 11, 2011"

  1. PJR   July 11, 2011 at 3:31 PM

    Nice try, Mr. Beardsley. Haven’t you missed (conveniently omitted?) the real source of the opposition to Harper’s claims as reported?

    Harper is also reported to have said, “Conservative values are Canadian values. Canadian values are Conservative values. They always were. And Canadians are going back to the party that most closely reflects who they really are: The Conservative Party, which is Canada’s party.”

    Really? Pure assertion, pure presumption, pure nonsense. Weaseling: Harper’s Conservatives are not the PCs. Disconnected from reality: 60% of Canadians rejected Harper at the polls. And so, yes, arrogant!

  2. Furtz   July 11, 2011 at 6:45 PM

    PJR, We have to let Harper gloat for a while. Watching the hated Libs go down in flames (deservedly) had to be the highest point in Harper’s life so far. Let him preen and strut for the summer. Maybe in a year or two he’ll be limping.

  3. PJR   July 11, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    Charitable of you, Furtz. The prospect is nauseating.

  4. Furtz   July 12, 2011 at 7:19 AM

    It is interesting that even with his majority grasp on power, he is still compelled to publicly insult the majority of voters. It’s a personality defect that could sink him four years from now.

  5. PJR   July 12, 2011 at 12:15 PM

    We can hope, Furtz. You put it well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.