So I was sitting having lunch with Joe Gunn yesterday. Joe is of course not a Liberal by any means or definition. We have these occasional meetings and usually end up discussing politics and making “two bit” bets.
Since the Cornwall News has evolved I’ve become more interested in Politics at all levels, and have had the opportunity to discuss and learn at the foot of many an experienced and wizened soul.
Personally I want to send a copy of Macbeth to each major Liberal Party of Canada player. My membership recently expired and I’ve yet to renew with the party. My personal issues I won’t print at the moment, and as was suggested to me by many people my role as editor of this paper should be more neutral and party friendly which is something I’ve tried to do at all times.
Sure I’m not a supporter of Mr. Harper’s government, but that’s more out of my lack of appreciation for Neo-Con philosophy or agendas.
Personally I think that the pie should be shared more friendly with less going to those that need it less than those that need it more. I get labeled a socialist as though it’s a horrible thing, but as I’ve pointed out to many, they have rich people in Sweden yet somehow manage to do a better job at taking care of their population.
Back to the Liberals. L I N K Not sure if a story like this is tossed out as Conservative propaganda to undermine confidence or by Liberals who simply have come to the conclusion that Mr. Ignatieff isn’t the man to do the job.
“Since Pierre Trudeau, no Liberal leader has left on his own terms. John Turner was shown the door by the Chrétienites; Jean Chrétien was forced out by Martinites; we know what happened to Dion and now we see Ignatieff is on the same path.”
Certainly the numbers are not in his favor, and of course he faces a difficult task, but I have to say as someone that’s been a Liberal Party of Canada supporter that this party is in great jeopardy of falling behind Mr. Layton and the NDP.
I don’t say that as though it would be the worst thing in the world to happen. Just pointing out that people that eat their own as openly as the Liberal party of Canada has in the last few years don’t create confidence in the electorate.
While I and many of those that read this may disagree and not support Mr. Harper I will give him full credit for the “appearance” of strength. It’s his way or the highway as clearly evidenced by those that have left his team and the inactions of our own MP who clearly shows who he feels he works for.
That strength I think is something that Canadians respect and appreciate. I think it’s something they understand too. It resonates in the dark of a voting booth or in their private thoughts.
It will take a lot more than slick ads and horrible economic numbers to defeat Mr. Harper. I think if an election were held today Mr. Harper would finally have his majority and I’m not sure that it would be the best thing for Canada.
So maybe it would be best if the Liberal Party of Canada united behind Frank McKenna. I think even if only for one wonderful term a lot of positive changes could occur for Canada, but I think even this plan can only work if the Liberal Party of Canada big stage players united, cleaned house properly and simply decided that if you can’t follow a leader and be a team, then they need to find another party.
The next Federal election is to me only going to be about one issue and that’s whether to give Stephen Harper a mandate and majority or not. If Canada chooses that they are choosing everything he stands for. The options should be clear, and the voting should represent that clarity.
please visit our sponsors: