View from the Hill by Keith Beardsley – Lessons from Ontario Election – October 7, 2011

CFN – The Ontario election has now moved into our history books. It was a relatively dull campaign with few issues that grabbed the imagination of the voter. What made it interesting though was the come from behind victory of the McGuinty Liberals.

Each of the federal parties can learn something from this campaign which centered on an unpopular leader who still managed to win, albeit with a minority.

To their credit the Liberals found an issue that resonated with voters- stability in a time of economic uncertainty. The Conservatives on the other hand seemed unable to shift gears when world affairs and a pending economic crisis began to overshadow their message on reducing taxes.  Yes people were upset with what they pay in taxes, but it was never their primary concern- hope for the future and their jobs was the issue.

The federal parties should also take note that campaigns that are almost entirely negative don’t work. I never got a sense from the Conservatives of hope for the future. There was no strong appeal to the heart of the voters; instead it was an angry campaign that battered the voter with one attack after another with no sense of a solution to issues besides cutting taxes. The language was always tough, the message negative. As a partisan I have always enjoyed a good attack ad, but I had to wonder if a partisan was getting turned off by this barrage of negativity what must it be doing to nonaligned voters?

While the Conservative message focused on taxes there wasn’t a clear link as to how lower taxes would benefit voters with a stronger future. They left to many questions unanswered and when you leave a void like that in the voters’ minds, another party can step in and fill it. I thought the Liberal health care ad was superb as it comparing Hudak’s record in the Mike Harris era to McGuinty’s record now. With a huge population of baby-boomers wondering about their own health, that was an ad that could resonant with voters- fewer hospitals under the Conservatives to more under the Liberals. The Conservatives never explained how cutting taxes would help more students to go to university, never explained how lower taxes could improve public transportation in our cities and they could never answer the unease property owners felt when the Liberals suggested Hudak would unload everything onto the cities again as Harris had done previously.

Another part of the Conservative’s problem was the language used, the words, not the just the message. I could see where they were trying to take their message of the day but the sound bites just weren’t right. Probably the best example was at the beginning of the campaign when Hudak got caught up in the “foreign workers” issue around McGuinty’s job plan for new immigrants. When that story broke I sent a note to a friend of mine on the campaign and said “your team just blew it.” It sounded like an angry old white guy’s campaign reminiscent of some of the Reform Party campaigns of the 1990’s. Initial results today bear that out and show that the provincial Tories squandered the good will that the Harper Tories had built up in the large metropolitan ethnic ridings. That one issue certainly cost them dearly this campaign.

The federal Liberals can draw a sense of hope that not all is lost. Years of rebuilding are ahead of them but there was no sudden rush for everyone to vote NDP. The provincial party still managed a win and with the right campaign themes the federal Liberals have a chance to make a comeback. But they should not think that it will happen overnight or without a lot of hard work in the next four years.

Andrea Horwath has improved the NDP’s numbers but the lesson for the federal NDP is that you need substance and a believable platform. Running on hope and good will isn’t good enough. Nor can you rely on the Layton legacy to win elections. People vote for the here and now and the future, not for nostalgia over what might have been.

In the end every campaign is about balance. You need the attack ads because they can work. Too many turn voters off, if not away from your party. Plus, you have to have a message of hope for the future. In other words appeal to both the head and the heart.

Keith Beardsley is a senior strategist for True North Public Affairs in Ottawa, as well as a blogger and political analyst. He can often be found running or cycling on his favorite bike trails.

Remax

10 Responses to "View from the Hill by Keith Beardsley – Lessons from Ontario Election – October 7, 2011"

  1. Reg   October 7, 2011 at 10:06 AM

    After the implementation of the HST I thought for sure the liberals would not be in power after the next election. it was the Conservatives election to lose. And they did.

    Now if McGuinty could get just one Dipper to change colours then the there would be another Liberal majority.

    Unfortunitly here in SD&SG, it seems that the big blue machine could get a basset hound elected.

  2. PJR   October 7, 2011 at 10:30 AM

    Good post mortem, Keith. You’re being unfair to basset hounds, Reg.

    Now SD&SG has two seat-warmers in parliament. How good is that.

  3. Eric   October 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM

    Something that I would like to understand is how not uploading to the province would matter. I give money to the city and province to deal with things, should the amount not already be covered? It should be just a paperwork shuffle between a couple of departments.

    The Liberals have been very good at distraction, and the Conservatives not having a leader in the public eyes for a few elections aided that.

    Congrats to all those who won and more so to those that tried.

  4. Roy Berger   October 7, 2011 at 11:47 AM

    The 2011 Ontario election may have been legal but it doesn’t meet the criteria for a legitimate, rational election. It didn’t meet the majority requirement of quorum. In reality the process, outcome and players don’t have majority social consensus or approval. I don’t know where that path leads, but there it is.

  5. Stan   October 7, 2011 at 1:06 PM

    Reg, my Jessy resents that remark about basset hounds.

  6. smee   October 7, 2011 at 1:30 PM

    ah the commenst of teachers with expired atatus …always comical

  7. Furtz   October 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM

    Given the huge lead the Cons had going into this election, and the low voter turnout, it looks like a lot of Progressive Cons took a look at Hudak and didn’t like what they saw. There was a lot to dislike about the Libs… HST, hydro rates etc, but there was a hell of a lot more to dislike about Hudak. There’s something about a smart-ass frat-boy with no platform other than bashing Libs and “foreign” workers and such that just doesn’t inspire voters. I bet Frat-boy has a few knives in his back already, and rightly so.

  8. Reg   October 7, 2011 at 8:45 PM

    I hate to do this but…Smee, what language are you writing in? It’s not English or French.

  9. smee   October 8, 2011 at 11:37 AM

    Tennessee style Reg

  10. jacobmarley   October 11, 2011 at 11:43 AM

    I totally agree with Keith. You can’t run an entire campaign in attack mode. You can’t run a paper that way either.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.